A personal growth map
Where you are, where you want to go and what is most useful to practice right now. We set a goal you can measure along the way.
Move forward with something you can show.
We sharpen your professional goal, identify gaps and build a plan grounded in doing: a hands-on project, a portfolio and practice explaining what you built and why.
Talk about One-on-One Professional MentoringWhere you are, where you want to go and what is most useful to practice right now. We set a goal you can measure along the way.
A scope you can actually finish, with room for planning, development, testing and explaining your decisions. The hands-on work is yours.
Practice questions, system design thinking and presenting your portfolio. Focused feedback on where to go deeper.
Developer mentoring is a way to move your career forward without guessing alone what to learn, in what order and how to prove it. Instead of yet another generic course, the work follows your goal: moving into DevOps, getting into AI engineering or tech interview preparation, with a real project and feedback from someone who has walked the path himself.
A course teaches material. Mentoring helps you decide which of that material matters for you, and makes sure it turns into a skill you can show. A good mentor does not do the work for you: they ask the right questions, point out gaps that are hard to see from the inside and give feedback on real work, not textbook exercises.
The difference shows most when there is too much information. You can spend months on certificates, reading lists and courses that lead to nothing a technical interviewer wants to see. Career mentoring in tech brings the focus back to three questions: what the role you are aiming for really requires, what you already have and what the next thing worth building is.
Good mentoring also changes the kind of questions you ask. Instead of which tool to learn, you get to questions like why you chose this solution and what you would do differently if the system grew several times over. Those are exactly the questions interviews test, and exactly the ones that are hard to practice alone.
Mentoring is built for people who are already in tech, or close to it, and want to take their next step deliberately. For example:
It is less suited to people looking for a placement track or someone to build their project for them. The hands-on work stays yours, and that is exactly what makes it worth something in an interview.
Not everyone needs a long process. The format follows the question you arrive with, and you can switch between formats along the way.
In tech interview preparation, most of the work is not memorizing answers but practicing thinking out loud. Interviewers want to see how you break down a problem, what you ask before answering and how you handle a question you cannot answer. In a DevOps interview that might be troubleshooting a failed deployment or designing a pipeline; in an AI role, designing a RAG system and explaining how you would know it answers correctly. All of this can be practiced, and a mock interview quickly shows what works and what does not.
Moving into DevOps is not a list of tools. What interviewers look for is an understanding of the path code takes from commit to production: how the build runs, where artifacts live, how infrastructure is managed as code, how you deploy to Kubernetes and how you find out something broke. People coming from development or automation already know part of that path, so it makes sense to start there and expand outward.
A good starting point for moving into DevOps is to take a small application you have already written, package it with Docker, build a pipeline that tests and deploys it, and provision the environment with Terraform. Each of those steps opens a whole topic to learn, and by the end you have something you can show.
In AI, learning AI as a developer does not mean becoming a model researcher. The skill in demand is engineering: connecting a language model to an organization's data with RAG, building workflows with agents and tools, measuring whether answers are good and running all of it reliably. Here a DevOps background is a real advantage, because an AI system in production needs the same pipelines, permissions and monitoring as any other system.
The principle is the same on both paths: one deep project that covers the process end to end is worth more than ten small exercises.
The structure is fixed and the content adapts to your goal, so it is always clear where you are in the process.
We talk about your background, what you have done so far and the role you are aiming for. By the end it should be clear whether mentoring is the right step and in which format.
We compare what the role requires with what you already have and choose what to focus on first. Not every gap deserves the same investment, and some close with a single project.
We set near-term goals and a project scoped so you can finish it. The plan is written down, so every session starts with what was supposed to happen and what actually did.
You work between sessions. In sessions we go over what you built, get you unstuck, review code and infrastructure and update the plan based on what we learned.
You practice explaining the project and your decisions, go through mock interviews and we sum up the next step, including after mentoring ends.
The main outcome of good mentoring is not a feeling of confidence but tangible things: a project on GitHub you can send to a recruiter, documentation that explains your decisions and the ability to talk about all of it in an interview without reciting. Alongside that you leave with a learning map you can keep following on your own.
A good portfolio project meets a few simple requirements: it has a README explaining the problem and how to run it, it is built and tested in an automated pipeline, it documents the main decisions and what did not work, and you can discuss it in depth without running out of things to say. A project like that answers some interview questions on its own, before anyone asks them.
Progress is measured against goals set at the start and checked along the way. Was the latest milestone completed? Can you now solve on your own a problem that needed help a month ago? Does your explanation of the project sound clearer with each mock interview? When goals stop moving, that is a signal to change the plan, not to keep going the same way.
A good mentor is first of all someone who does the work you are aiming for, or did it recently. A few things worth checking:
And mistakes to avoid: collecting certificates instead of building one thing in depth; picking a project so big it never ends; trying to learn DevOps, AI and a new programming language all at once; and walking into an interview without having practiced explaining out loud what you built and why.
I have made the moves most mentees ask about. I started as an automation developer, led automation development technically in C# and CI/CD, combined a DevOps role with leading automation, moved into a full DevOps Engineer role and today work as an AI Solutions Architect. Every step on that path is a question I have already answered for myself.
As an architect, I design and build end-to-end AI solutions: RAG pipelines, agentic and multi-agent workflows and LLM-based organizational platforms, from concept to production. My DevOps background includes Kubernetes, including AKS and OpenShift, Terraform, Docker, Azure, Azure DevOps, GitHub, Nexus, CI/CD pipelines and microservices. That is exactly the material DevOps and AI interviews ask about.
That experience translates into practical mentoring: I know what it takes to move from automation development into DevOps because I made that move myself, and I know what an AI architect needs to understand about infrastructure because that is my daily work.
I have also taught, as an assistant lecturer in a software engineering course at Ariel University, where I learned to explain complex topics to people starting from very different places. I work independently, so mentoring is done directly with me.
Bechor Simhaev · AI solutions architect & DevOps
I take an AI idea and turn it into a system running in your organization: RAG over your knowledge, agents and agentic workflows, and LLM-based platforms. From discovery to production.
The difference: I don’t stop at the demo. Hands-on experience in DevOps, Azure, Kubernetes and on-prem clusters in closed environments with EKS Anywhere and OpenShift means the solution is built from day one to run in your environment, with its security and permissions. And I’m independent, with no commissions and no preferred tool, so the recommendation rests only on what is right for you.
Mentoring can include interview prep, portfolio work and career direction. It is not a placement service, and there is no promise of a job offer.
Yes. Mentoring can be built around a specific project or problem, with scope and outcome agreed in advance.
We look at your background and goal in an intro call. The plan is based on where you are starting from, not a one-size-fits-all track.
Cost mainly depends on the format: a single session, a package of sessions or ongoing mentoring. It is also affected by how much review happens between sessions, such as going over code and documentation, and whether dedicated prep for a specific interview is needed. After the intro call you receive a proposal based on the agreed plan.
There is no single answer. It depends on your background, the time you can invest and the role you are aiming for. A developer who has already worked with CI/CD is in a very different place from someone starting from scratch, so the plan is set after gap mapping, not before.
Most sessions are held over video with screen sharing, since that is the easiest way to go through code, terminals and pipelines together. In-person meetings are possible by prior arrangement.
In ongoing mentoring we meet at a regular pace that leaves enough time for work between sessions. The pace is set together and changes with the stage: more often before an interview, less often during a calmer building phase.
Building AI systems at an engineering level requires a programming foundation: writing code, working with Git and reading documentation. If that foundation is not there yet, we start with it and bring AI into the very first project.
Yes. A mock interview runs like a real one, with technical questions, a system design question and questions about your experience, followed by detailed feedback. With your consent it can be recorded so you can see for yourself where your explanation stalls.
Yes. If you know which tools your target company uses, for example Azure, GitHub Actions or managed Kubernetes, the project and practice are built around them. If not, we choose common tools and focus on principles that transfer easily between them.
That is a natural part of the process. A channel for short questions between sessions can be arranged as agreed, and sometimes the blocker itself becomes the topic of the next session. The most meaningful learning usually happens at exactly those points.
Yes, as part of preparing for a job search. The feedback checks whether what is written reflects what you actually did and built, and whether the project from mentoring is presented so a technical interviewer understands it quickly.
At the end you receive a summary of what was achieved and a plan for continuing on your own. You can come back for a follow-up session before an interview, after starting a new role or when a new professional question comes up.
Definitely. Mentoring can help you go deeper in a specific area such as Kubernetes or Terraform, prepare for a more senior role or expand into AI, for example running LLM-based systems in production and building pipelines around them.
Have an idea, a need or a question that hasn’t settled yet? Let’s work out together what’s right to do.
Let’s talk A direct conversation. A clear direction. A step that fits you.